Départ de Quimperlé pour la manif de Nantes

that the Lord's Supper teaches us about enileonmrntaivsm (a/k/a creation care ) because the elements of wine and bread are used. I kept thinking, Do this in remembrance of But those are the type of issues and direction that the former leaders of the SBC would have taken us. All one has to do is read the CBF material, look at the schools it supports. look at its steadfast refusal to have any doctrinal confession (as a matter of pride, mind you), look at the agencies it supports (e.g. The Baptist Center for Ethics) and you see immediately a group of people with a different theology in many cases (at least in what they are willing to tolerate) which results in a different emphasis and practice.The SBC and the CBF could not exist in one body any more than Tories and Labour. So it is good that they can pursue their respective beliefs and agendas. I do not wish anyone ill. But to play like there's no difference is willful blindness. And that is not a healthy state of being.P.S. I don't know David Gushee, but I did read his recent opinion on Which Kind of Baptist Are You? or something. It celebrated women's ordination. I know that there are Christians who believe in that. The SBC has gone on record saying it does not. What bothered me most about Gushee's article was not what he believed, but the put down on anyone who believed differently. Some like, I am glad I am the kind of Baptist that doesn't believe in denying a chance to serve to half the human species.. or something like that. I thought his attitude was a bit smug toward those who might have a different view, which includes about 2000 years of Christian practice and tradition, and 2000 years before that of Jewish law and tradition when it came to priestly service. And come to think of it Jesus, himself, who chose 12 men to be his disciples.